Monday, November 16, 2015

RPiTC2 beta 1.99 startup time

Well, not bad, isnt it? :)

root@rpitc-fd061ded:~# systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 1.323s (kernel) + 3.929s (userspace) = 5.253s

root@rpitc-fd061ded:~# system-analyze plot -> rpitc2.0.svg

root@rpitc-fd061ded:~# systemd-analyze blame
          1.407s dev-mmcblk0p2.device
           986ms NetworkManager.service
           613ms user@1000.service
           537ms networking.service
           456ms lightdm.service
           301ms alsa-restore.service
           295ms systemd-user-sessions.service
           267ms systemd-journald.service
           253ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service
           242ms systemd-udev-trigger.service
           217ms systemd-fsck-root.service
           185ms systemd-modules-load.service
           180ms systemd-logind.service
           178ms fake-hwclock.service
           175ms ntp.service
           172ms polkitd.service
           166ms wpa_supplicant.service
           121ms systemd-udevd.service
           106ms user@0.service
            91ms systemd-journal-flush.service
            78ms dev-mqueue.mount
            76ms systemd-update-utmp.service
            72ms kmod-static-nodes.service
            68ms sys-kernel-debug.mount
            67ms console-setup.service
            63ms systemd-sysctl.service
            49ms boot.mount
            48ms home-rpitc-.cache-mozilla.mount
            43ms rc-local.service
            42ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
            40ms tmp.mount
            40ms systemd-random-seed.service
            35ms systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service
            34ms systemd-remount-fs.service
            33ms var-log.mount
            23ms systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service
            21ms var-tmp.mount
            21ms sys-kernel-config.mount
            13ms keyboard-setup.service

3 comments:

  1. Nice work! Is there a way to try this or any other beta release?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1.4 is already really nice, but really interested in testing any beta release like this one ;)

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.